• Article highlight
  • Article tables
  • Article images

Article History

Received : 09-05-2023

Accepted : 20-06-2023



Article Metrics




Downlaod Files

   


Article Access statistics

Viewed: 265

PDF Downloaded: 232


Get Permission Khare, Singh, and Waskle: Establishment of a lower cut off to diagnose hypothyroidism in Indian pregnant women


Introduction

Thyroid disorder is a common in pregnancy and affects both maternal and fetal outcomes. There are limited data on prevalence of hypothyroidism during pregnancy from India.1 The overall prevalence of hypothyroidism varies from 0.3-11.1% with subclinical hypothyroidism (SCH) being commoner than overt hypothyroidism.2, 3, 4 due to their nonspecific symptoms and hyper metabolic state of pregnancy thyroid disorders are often overlooked in pregnancy most of the time. Hence the laboratory measurement of thyroid dysfunction is very important role in the assessment of maternal thyroid health. The main stay of thyroid function evaluation is serum thyroxin stimulating hormone (TSH) assessment.5 the thyroid dysfunction leads to physiological changes in pregnancy.

Serum TSH values of 4.0-6.0µIU/ml were considered normal in the past recent opinions suggest that first trimester values >2.5 µIU/ml and second and third trimester values >3µIU/ml are outside the normal range.3, 6, 5, 7 Maternal hypothyroidism has been associated with adverse pregnancy complications as well as detrimental effects upon fetal neurocognitive development. Specific maternal adverse outcome includes anemia, abortion, preterm labour, gestational hypertension, preeclampsia and placental abruption.4, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 Fetal complications include prematurity, intrauterine foetal growth restriction, intrapartum foetal distress, foetal demise.4, 6, 3, 9, 11, 12

The latest American thyroid Association Guidelines (ATA Guidelines), which recommend that TSH upper cut off value for pregnant women & for women on L-thyroxin therapy should be <2.5mIU/L in first trimester and <3.0mIU/L in second and third trimester.13 many studies available in the world so it is very essential to develop norms for Indian populations [mainly pregnant women’s], due to ethnic variations, different environmental conditions and more so after two decades of salt iodization programme.14, 15, 16 Presently there is a paucity of Indian data regarding the cut off value of serum TSH to label a pregnant women as hypothyroid.13 Keeping all these points in view this study was planned to analyze the foeto-maternal outcome in hypothyroid women with serum TSH >6.2mIU/L and in women having TSH between 3.0-6.2mIU/L, to establish a lower cut off value for serum TSH.

Materials and Methods

This is a prospective and retrospective cohort study conducted in a period of 1.5 years between September 2021 to April 2023, in the department of Obstetrics & Gynecology GMC Shahdol, in 1000 pregnant women attending the antenatal OPD were recruited for the study.

All healthy pregnant women with singleton pregnancy willing to participate in the study were enrolled; women if they had multiple pregnancy, known chronic medical disorder like diabetes, hypertension, any autoimmune disorder with hyperthyroidism or known hypothyroidism, bad obstetric history with a known cause, were excluded.

A detailed history & examination was performed, clinical features of hypothyroidism, past & family history of known thyroid dysfunction was noted. Serum samples were collected in plain vial for TSH estimation. The normal range for TSH is 0.4-6.2mIU/L for this laboratory. Women with serum TSH >6.2mIU/L labeled as hypothyroid according to laboratory reference range for TSH. All women with TSH >6.2mIU/L underwent Free Thyroxin (FT4) estimation to label them as OH with low FT4 or SCH with normal FT4 and categorized as group I & II respectively. The normal range for FT4 is 0.76-2.24ng/dl for this laboratory. Women with serum TSH between 3-6.2mIU/L categorized as group III (foeto-maternal outcome assessed to establish a lower cut off for Indian pregnant women) and women with serum TSH level between 0.4-3mIU/L labeled as euthyroid taken as control. Women labeled as hypothyroid were referred to endocrinology clinic for simultaneous treatment and follow up.

Maternal variables assessed were

  1. Anaemia

  2. Spontaneous abortion

  3. Gestational hypertension (GHTN)

  4. Pre-eclampsia (PE)

  5. Gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM)

  6. Placental abruption

  7. Mode of delivery

Foetal variables assessed were

  1. Prematurity

  2. Intrauterine growth restriction (IUGR)

  3. Intrauterine foetal demise (IUFD)

  4. Foetal distress (FD)

  5. Low APGAR – APGAR is ≤7 at 5minutes,

  6. Neonatal intensive care unit admission (NICU)

  7. Neonatal hypothyroidism – serum TSH level >20mU/L after 72 hours of birth.

Foeto-maternal outcomes were compared between group I, II, III and controls. Data was analyzed using Pearson Chi square test. The significance level was set at p<0.05. Statistical analysis was performed with SPSS 12.0 for window

Results

Out of 1000 women studied a total of 102 women had TSH >6.2mIU/L, giving a prevalence of hypothyroidism as 10.2% with SCH 6.4% & OH 3.8% respectively. Thirty-three hypothyroid women who were already on treatment with L thyroxin therapy, were excluded from the study. Among the remaining 69 women, 21 (30.43%) were OH and 48 (69.56%) were SCH, categorized on the basis of FT4 estimation constituted group I &II. Women with serum TSH 3-6.2mIU/L (n=66) were grouped in group III. Demographic profile of group I, II and III is depicted in Table 1, Table 2.

Table 1

Demographic profile of group III and control

Age (years)

Group III (n=66)

Control (n=66)

Number

Percent (%)

Number

Percent (%)

≤20

6

9.09

6

9.09

21-25

44

66.66

44

66.66

26-30

13

19.69

13

19.69

31-35

3

4.54

3

4.54

Parity

Primigravidae

34

51.51

34

51.51

Multigravidae

32

48.48

32

48.48

Education

Illiterate

33

50.00

32

48.48

Primary

15

22.72

17

25.75

Middle

14

21.21

12

18.18

Graduate

4

6.06

5

7.57

Socio-Economic Status

Lower

4

6.06

8

12.12

Upper lower

31

46.96

33

50.00

Lower middle

18

27.27

16

24.24

Upper middle

9

13.63

5

7.57

Upper

4

6.06

4

6.06

Occupation

House wife

56

84.84

57

86.36

Self employed

2

3.03

3

4.54

Professional

8

12.12

6

9.09

Table 2

Comparison of maternal variables in OH, SCH (group I&II) & control

Maternal Variables

Overt Hypothyroid (I) (n= 21)

Euthyroid (n= 69)

p value

Subclinical Hypothyroid (grpII)(n= 48)

Euthyroid (n= 69)

p value

number %

number %

number%

number%

Anemia

17

80.95

49

71.01

0.367

35

72.91

49

71.01

0.822

Abortion

1

4.76

1

1.44

0.367

0

0

1

1.44

0.402

GHTN

2

9.52

2

2.89

0.197

3

6.25

2

2.89

0.378

PE   

4

19.04

2

2.89

0.009

4

8.33

2

2.89

0.190

GDM

4

19.04

1

1.44

0.002

3

6.25

1

1.44

0.160

Placental abruption

0

0

0

0

-

0

0

0

0

-

Figure 1

Maternal variables

https://typeset-prod-media-server.s3.amazonaws.com/article_uploads/c2af635f-86fd-4df2-bbed-c8884fab157d/image/c7baa382-508a-45e2-82d3-8065813c0c76-uimage.png

Table 2 illustrates the maternal variables assessed in group I & II. PE, GDM IUFD developed in significantly higher number of women in OH group as compared to controls (p=0.009, p=0.002, p=0.002). FD was observed in significantly higher number of women in SCH as compared to control (p=0.004), illustrated in table 3 &4.

Table 3

Comparison of foetal variables in OH, SCH (group I&II) & control

Foetal Variables

Overt Hypothyroid (groupI) (n= 21)

Euthyroid (n= 69)

P value

Subclinical Hypothyroid (group II) (n= 48)

Euthyroid (n= 69)

P value

number%

number %

Number %

number %

PTB   

1

4.76

4

5.79

0.203

3

6.25

4

5.79

0.919

IUGR

3

14.28

6

8.69

0.186

6

12.50

6

8.69

0.505

IUFD

4

19.04

1

1.44

0.002

1

2.08

1

1.44

0.795

Foetal Distress

3

14.28

6

8.69

0.455

14

29.16

6

8.69

0.004

Low APGAR at 5minute

1

4.76

4

5.79

0.856

5

10.41

4

5.79

0.356

NICU Admission

4

19.04

4

5.79

0.186

7

14.58

4

5.79

0.391

Neonatal hypothyroidism

0

0

0

0

-

0

0

0

0

-

Figure 2

Fetal variables

https://s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/typeset-prod-media-server/e0470fb5-fd63-4b62-8ee8-741453b41e86image1.png
Table 4

Comparison of maternal variables in group III and control

Maternal Variables

Group III (n=66)

Control (n=66)

p value

number percent (%)

number percent (%)

Anemia

48

72.72

48

72.72

1

Spontaneous Abortion

1

1.51

1

1.51

1

Hypertensive Disorders

GHTN

0

0

2

3.03

0.154

Preeclampsia

2

3.03

1

1.51

0.559

GDM

4

6.06

1

1.51

0.171

Placental Abruption

0

0

0

0

Table 5

Distribution of women according to mode of delivery

Mode Of Delivery

Group III (n=65) *

Control (n=65) *

p value

number

Percent (%)

number

Percent (%)

Vaginal delivery

56

86.15

59

90.76

0.310

LSCS For FD

4

6.15

4

6.15

1

LSCS For Other causes

5

7.69

2

3.07

0.244

Majority of women in group I &II delivered vaginally. None other maternal or foetal variable compared showed significant difference. Table 4, Table 5 demonstrates maternal and foetal variables assessed in group III and control. PE, GDM (p=0.559, p=0.171) and other maternal variables assessed none was significantly different from control group. Among foetal variables assessed IUGR, IUFD (p=0.545 p=0.154), and none other foetal parameter assessed was significantly different from control group. Equal number of women in both the groups had LSCS for foetal distress.

Table 6

Comparison of foetal variables in group III and Control

Foetal Variables

Group III ( n=66)

Control (n=66)

p value

Number (%)

Percent

number

Percent (%)

Preterm Birth

2

3.03

1

1.51

0.559

IUGR

7

10.60

5

7.57

0.545

IUFD

2

3.03

0

0

0.154

Foetal Distress

10

15.15

8

12.12

0.457

Low APGAR at 5 Minute

4

6.06

1

1.51

0.171

NICU Admission

5

7.57

2

3.03

0.300

Neonatal hypothyroidism

0

0

0

0

-

Discussion

The overall prevalence of hypothyroidism in our study was 10.2%, with SCH and OH being present in 6.4% & 3.8% women respectively. This value is similar to, an Indian study by Sahu et al who reported a prevalence of SCH and OH as 6.47% & 4.38% respectively.6 these both studies done in tertiary health center.

These results are higher than developing countries, like USA, UK. Studies from USA have reported the overall incidence of hypothyroidism between 2.2%- 2.5% with an incidence of SCH and OH ranging from 2.2%-2.3% and 0.2%-0.3% respectively.2, 3, 4

Prevalence of both SCH & OH is higher in iodine deficiency regions in India. 13 The USA, UK and Finland are a relatively iodine sufficient countries; there is also have adequate iodine supplementation and even pregnant population has sufficient iodine intake.17, 18, 13

Studies conducted in the past, showed that by using the classical non pregnant reference range, one might misdiagnose as “normal’ those women who already have a slight TSH elevation.5 ATA Guidelines recommend that TSH upper cut off value for pregnant women & for women on L-thyroxin therapy should be <2.5IU/L in first trimester and <3.0IU/L in second and third trimester.13

Although several studies are available from different regions of the world it is essential to develop norms for Indian population. No difference was observed in the demographic profile of group III and control group.

Amongst all the maternal & foetal variables analyzed in this group, none were significantly different from the control group. These results indicate that women with TSH levels between 3-6.2mIU/L are at no added risk of adverse foeto-maternal outcome as compared to women with TSH <3mIU/L, hence no extra maternal & foetal monitoring is required for this group of women. Studies from countries like USA, China and Switzerland have established that serum TSH values during pregnancy are lower than the nonpregnant reference range, they have also determined trimester specific reference ranges for serum TSH during pregnancy.19, 20, 21 The ATA recommends that if trimester specific reference ranges are not available, the upper cut off for serum TSH in pregnancy should be taken as 2.5mIU/L in the first trimester and 3.0mIU/L in second and third trimester.13 The group III was designed to find out maternal and foetal outcome, by applying the lower serum TSH threshold in the Indian population; however, no statistically significant difference in maternal and foetal outcome was observed in this group as compared with controls.

The findings of our study are, however, consistent with the observations by Marwaha et al, in which the upper cut off for trimester specific serum TSH values in the Indian population were found to be higher i.e 5.0mIU/L, 5.78mIU/L and 5.70mIU/L in the first second and third trimester respectively.22 The present study supports the observations of Marwaha et al and suggests that the serum TSH values in pregnant Indian women are higher than their counterparts in other countries due to ethnic variations, different environmental conditions and more so after two decades of salt iodization programme.14, 15, 16 However, further studies are required to accurately define the normal range of serum TSH during pregnancy and to analyze the implications of serum TSH levels on pregnancy outcome, in a range that had previously been considered normal. Hence serum TSH (0.4-6.2mIU/L) in the nonpregnant range may be taken as normal during pregnancy in the Indian population, till we have population based Indian studies including larger cohorts, to establish trimester specific ranges in pregnant women.

In an Italian study, Negro et al compared the foeto-maternal outcome in women with serum TSH levels <2.5mIU/L and 2.5-5.0mIU/L, during the first trimester in TPO-Ab negative women. The study found a significant difference in the spontaneous pregnancy loss observed in the two groups (3.6% vs 6.1% respectively, p= <0.006). The study concluded that the increased rates of spontaneous foetal loss in women with serum TSH between 2.5-5.0mIU/L, provides strong support to redefine the normal serum TSH levels, especially in the first trimester.7 The results of the present study are different from these observations. However, the sample size of our study was much smaller than that of Negro et al (66 vs 3481); besides, most women were enrolled during the second trimester as compared to 100% enrolment in the first trimester in the study by Negro et al.

We found that, untreated or uncontrolled overt hypothyroidism during pregnancy may increase the incidence of maternal anemia, preeclampsia, GDM, spontaneous abortion, LBW, fetal death or still birth.6, 9, 23 In this study also the incidence of preeclampsia (p=0.009), GDM (p=0.002) was significantly high in overt hypothyroid group. In the past studies it has been shown that these women have higher incidence of PTB, IUGR, abruption, perinatal and neonatal morbidity and mortality.10, 24, 25 Intrauterine foetal demise occurred in significantly higher number of women in OH group (p=0.002). FD was observed in significantly higher number of women in SCH (p=0.004). The overall rate of LSCS for foetal distress was not statistically different from controls.

The strong point of this study is that we have included large number of subjects from India. However, there are few limitations of this study. We have not assessed trimester specific ranges. Follow up beyond newborn period was not possible because after discharge most infants either did not come for follow up or they were seen in pediatric clinic. We did not carry out thyroid examination using ultrasound, and we have not evaluated other causes of hypothyroidism in these women.

Conclusion

Based on the results of this study we conclude that Indian populations have high prevalence of hypothyroidism (10.2%), majority being subclinical (6.4%) & OH being 3.8% in Indian pregnant women. OH, is more commonly associated with adverse foeto-maternal outcome with respect to SCH. Serum TSH in the nonpregnant range may be taken as normal during pregnancy in the Indian population, till we have population based Indian studies including larger cohorts, to establish trimester specific ranges in pregnant women. We recommend a higher cut off for serum TSH to diagnose hypothyroidism ie >6.2mIU/L in Indian pregnant women and universal screening of hypothyroidism in our country to reduce the incidence of adverse foeto-maternal outcome.

From this study we know the level of thyroid cut off level in Indian pregnant women’s which can be used for diagnosis and treatment of this disorder.

Source of Funding

None.

Conflict of Interest

None.

References

1 

DK Dhanwal S Prasad AK Agarwal AK Banerjee High prevalence of subclinical hypothyroidism during first trimester of pregnancy in North IndiaIndian J Endocrinol Metab20131722814

2 

RZ Klein JE Haddow JD Faix RS Brown RJ Hermos A Pulkkinen Prevalence of thyroid deficiency in pregnant womenClin Endocrinol199135417

3 

WC Allan JE Haddow GE Palomaki JR Williams ML Mitchell RJ Hermos Maternal thyroid deficiency and pregnancy complications: implications for population screeningJ Med Screen2000712730

4 

BM Casey JS Dashe CE Wells DD Mcintire W Byrd KJ Leveno Subclinical hypothyroidism and pregnancy outcomesObstet Gynecol200510523984

5 

M Abalovich N Amino LA Barbout RH Cobin LJ Degroot D Glinoer Management of thyroid dysfunction during pregnancy and postpartum: an endocrine society clinical practice guidelineJ Clin Endocrinol Metab2007978147

6 

MT Sahu V Das S Mittal A Agarawal M Sahu Overt and subclinical thyroid dysfunction among Indian pregnant women and its effect on maternal and fetal outcomeArch Gynecol Obst201028121520

7 

R Negro A Schwartz R Gismondi A Tinelli T Mangieri Stagnaro-Green A Increased pregnancy loss rate in thyroid antibody negative women with TSH levels between 2.5 and 5.0 in the first trimester of pregnancyJ Clin Endocrinol Metab20109594452

8 

K Bukshee A Kriplani A Kapil VL Bhargava D Takkar Hypothyroidism complicating pregnancyAust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol19923232402

9 

AS Leung LK Millar PP Koonings M Montoro JH Mestman Perinatal outcome in hypothyroid pregnanciesObstet Gynecol199381334953

10 

M Abalovich S Gutierrez G Alcaraz G Maccallini A Garcia O Levalle Overt and subclinical hypothyroidism complicating pregnancyThyroid2002121638

11 

LE Davis KJ Leveno FG Cunningham Hypothyroidism complicating pregnancyObstet Gynecol198872110820

12 

N Wasserstrum CA Ananla Perinatal consequences of maternal hypothyroidism in early pregnancy and inadequate replacementClin Endocrinol19954243538

13 

AS Green M Abalovich AE Azizi F Mestman J Negro R Nixon Guidelines of the American Thyroid Association for the Diagnosis and Management of Thyroid Disease During Pregnancy and PostpartumThyroid2011273145

14 

SL La'ulu WL Roberts Second-trimester reference intervals for thyroid tests: the role of ethnicityClin Chem2007539165864

15 

RK Marwaha N Tandon N Gupta AK Karak K Verma N Kochupillai Residual goitre in the postiodization phase: iodine status, thiocyanate exposure and autoimmunityClin Endocrinol (Oxf)200359667281

16 

S Gopalakrishnan SP Singh WR Prasad SK Jain VK Ambardar R Sankar Prevalence of goitre and autoimmune thyroiditis in schoolchildren in Delhi, India after two decades of salt iodisationJ Pediatr Endocrinol Metab200619788993

17 

B Vaidya S Anthony M Bilous B Shields J Drury S Hutchison Detection of thyroid dysfunction in early pregnancy: universal screening or targeted high-risk case finding?J Clin Endocrinol Metab20079212037

18 

T Mannisto M Vaarasmaki A Pouta AL Hartikainen A Ruokonen HM Surcel Perinatal outcome of children born to mothers with thyroid dysfunction or antibodies: a prospective population-based cohort studyJ Clin Endocrinol Metab20099437729

19 

NS Panesar CY Li MS Rogers Reference intervals for thyroid hormones in pregnant Chinese womenAnn Clin Biochem200138432932

20 

R Stricker M Echenard R Eberhart MC Chevailler V Perez FA Quinn Evaluation of maternal thyroid function during pregnancy: the importance of using gestational age-specific reference intervalsEur J Endocrinol2007157450914

21 

BM Casey KJ Leveno Thyroid disease in pregnancyObstet Gynecol2006108128392

22 

RK Marwaha S Chopra S Gopalakrishnan B Shamra RS Kanwar A Sastry Establishment of reference range for thyroid hormones in normal pregnant Indian womenBJOG200811556026

23 

K Poppe D Glinoer Thyroid autoimmunity and hypothyroidism before and during pregnancyHum Reprod Update20039214961

24 

M Rashid MH Rashid Obstetric management of thyroid diseaseObstet Gynecol Surv200762106808

25 

TT Lao Lao TT Thyroid disorders in pregnancyCurr Opin Obstet Gynecol20051721237



jats-html.xsl


This is an Open Access (OA) journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.